Wednesday, April 9, 2014

The 1831 Census of Lower Canada ..........La Seignurie du Sault St-Louis



Our ancestor Denis Laplante (b. 1798), his son Denis (b. 1821) and his son Julien (b. 1850) were all born into the seigneurial system, an institutional form of land distribution established in New France in 1627 and officially abolished in 1854. Under the French regime, 80 per cent of the population in New France lived in rural areas governed by this system of land distribution and occupation. In principle, the seigneur granted a piece of land to a family under a royalty system. The family would engage in subsistence farming to meet most of their food, heating, and shelter needs.

The seigneurial system was based on the feudal system, which involved the personal dependency of censitaires or habitants (tenants) on the seigneur (lord). In New France the similarities ended with occupation of land and payment of certain dues. The tenant was normally referred to as a habitant. The Compagnie des Cent-Associés, which was granted ownership and legal and seigneurial rights over New France, from the Arctic to Florida, also obtained the right to allocate the land to its best advantage. The land was therefore granted as fiefs and seigneuries to the most influential colonists who, in turn, granted tenancies.

This politically determined system of land distribution was regulated by law and had many advantages. Its purpose was to promote settlement in a systematic way. Seigneuries, which were usually 1 x 3 leagues (5 x 15 km) in size, were generally divided into river lots (rangs), a survey system based on the French experience in Normandy. The long, rectangular strips were particularly well adapted to the local terrain, since they facilitated interaction between neighbours and provided multiple points of access to the river, the principal communication route. Individual holdings were large enough (usually about 3 x 30 arpents) to provide a reasonable living to farmers. The state established regulations to govern the system and the relationship between seigneurs and their tenants. The principal regulation granted a person, who thus became seigneur, a parcel of land that was to put into production, either directly or through concession to habitants who requested land. Portions of the seigneur's land were usually leased on the basis of a duly notarized contract. These acts of concession set out the rights and obligations of each party.

The seigneur had both onerous and honorary rights. He could establish a court of law, operate a mill and organize a commune. He received from the habitants various forms of rent: the cens, a small tithe dating from the feudal period, which reaffirmed the tenant's theoretical subjection to the seigneur; the rente in cash or kind; and the banalités, taxes levied on grain, which the tenant had to grind at his seigneur's mill. He also usually granted hunting, fishing and woodcutting licences. In the early 18th century, seigneurs began to insist that their tenants work for them a certain number of days annually (the Corvée).

As an institution, the seigneurial system played a leading role in building and maintaining social relations in New France. According to some historians, it represents [translation] “the essence of the social hierarchy and inequality that characterized pre-revolutionary France.” Whether they were of noble or common descent, the seigneurs were a privileged class, and their relationships with the censitaires were affected by the perception of the cens. However, this is not to suggest that the seigneuroppressed the censitaire. The availability of land in the 17th and 18th centuries allowed habitantsto choose where to settle. Furthermore, seigneurs who were too demanding, who were absentee landowners, or who neglected to develop their lands were less likely to attract settlers.

The seigneurial system was central to France's colonization policy and came to play a major role in traditional Québec society. Despite the attractions of city life and the fur trade, 75 to 80 per cent of the population lived on seigneurial land until the mid-19th century. Roughly 220 seigneuries were granted during the French regime. They covered virtually all the inhabited areas (36,500 km²) on both banks of the St. Lawrence River between Montréal and Québec City and the Chaudière and Richelieu Valleys and extended to the Gaspé Peninsula. Seigneuries were granted to the nobility, to religious institutions (in return for education and hospital services), to military officers and to civil administrators. Other institutional organizations such as parishes, municipalities and the militia held land bordering on these seigneuries.

This method of land settlement left its mark on both the countryside and the Québec mentality. The land of the habitant was a kind of economic unit essential for survival. Everyone hoped to be the sole tenant, producing most of what he required in order to live. The system of land tenure, which placed rural inhabitants close to one another, and in the early 19th century the village, were the foundation upon which the family, neighbour relations and community spirit developed. The closeness of this agricultural society to the soil led naturally to a feeling that land was included in one's patrimony, to be passed from generation to generation.

After Canada was ceded to Britain in 1763, new British laws respected the private agreements and the property rights of francophone society, and the seigneurial system was maintained. But as new land was opened for colonization, the township system developed. As time went on, the seigneurial system increasingly appeared to favour the privileged and to hinder economic development. After much political agitation, it was abolished in 1854 by a law that permitted tenants to claim rights to their land. The last vestiges of this institution, which many historians believe profoundly influenced traditional Québec society, did not disappear until a century later.

The 1831 Census of Lower Canada - Seignurie du Sault St-Louis, Paroisse de St. Constant. records Denis Laplante as head of a six person household within the Seignurie du Sault St-Louis, in the Paroisse de St. Constant.  The top of the map is south, the dark portion in the bottom right of the map is a section of the St-Laurent that flows around an island.  This area has since been straighten and made into a shipping canal but in the 1830s the narrow area was a section of white water rapids (sault) whence comes the name the Seigneurie of the St. Louis Falls.







Here is what the actual page from the census recording the elder Denis Laplante looks like:


The transcription of the page is as follows: 


Note that it does not identify profession so it's impossible to know without parish records whether or not the elder Denis had his own farm or worked someone else plot on the seigneurie.

The Laplantes in Lower Canada


The land where the Laplantes lived changed names several times over the course of history.   They lived in the Province of Lower Canada (French: province du Bas-Canada) which was a British colony on the lower Saint Lawrence River and the shores of the Gulf of Saint Lawrence (1791–1841). It covered the southern portion of the modern-day Province of Quebec, Canada, and the Labrador region of the modern-day Province of Newfoundland and Labrador. During the nineteenth century the parish, county and district maps changed frequently as the old system of the politics shifts, the ancient system of the seigneurs went away and the population grew.

In the Census of Lower Canada of 1825, we find four Chefs de Maison (heads of household) named Laplante in the parish of St. Constant. Of these, we can follow an unbroken record of the family from the elder Denis Laplante (b. 1798), his son Denis Laplante (b. 1821) to his son Julien who would eventually emigrate permanently to Rhode Island in the 1890s.

Denis and his son, the younger Denis lived in an area on the south shore of the Fleuve St-Laurent (St. Lawrence River) during a very tumultuous time in this region.  Just fifty years before the elder Denis was born, New France was conquered by the English in 1760 putting constant pressure on the French by resettling people from their other conquests,  the Irish and Scots.

When Denis was fifteen on 26 October 1813, a British force consisting of 1,630 regulars, volunteers and militia from Lower Canada and Mohawk warriors, commanded by Charles de Salaberry, repelled an American force of about 2,600 attempting to invade Lower Canada and ultimately attack Montreal in the Battle of the Chateauguay, an engagement of the War of 1812.

In 1825, Denis Laplante (age 27) and his wife Monique was a farmer with a household member of less than 6 years old.  We assume this is the younger Denis (b. 1821)  because the age fits with the 1861  Census which shows him living in District 8 of Lower Canada in redistricted Châteauguay County. With them also lived an unidentified unmarried man between 18 and 24.

Below is the row 1825 Census of Lower Canada recording Denis, it has been spliced with the table header to read the column values more easily.








When transcribed, it can be more easily read: 

Retour de la Population de la Paroisse de St. Constant Etablie dans la Comte d’Huntingdon
(Returns of the Population of the Parish of St. Constant, Established in the County of Huntingdon)




Earliest History



The land where the Laplantes lived has changed names several times over the course of history. The earliest related Laplantes that have been found lived on the Seigneurie du Sault St.Louis which was located on the south shore of the Saint Laurent (Lawrence) river to the southwest of Montreal.  From 1800 to present day this area has been divided up and redistricted over and over again as the population grew and history has played out..

According to the University of Montreal, the region known as New France before the English conquest of 1760 did not receive a great number of emigrants from across the Atlantic. Only 15,000 Frenchmen and Frenchwomen sailed for Canada in the seventeenth century, and two-thirds of them stayed in the colony for a short period and either returned to France or died in Canada without getting married. This was a very low number: the British Isles, with a population just over one-third of France’s, sent almost 380,000 immigrants to the New World over the same period.

France was at the time showing various symptoms of social discontent that should have justified a larger number of refugees fleeing to Canada, whose abundance of resources contrasted with the famine and unemployment among the poorest classes. Although France wasn’t really overpopulated, conditions there were favorable to emigration; these conditions, had they coincided with a real attraction of Canada, would have encouraged the departure of large contingents of settlers for the New World. But few French people migrated, as Canada, a distant, wild, and dangerous country, had a poor reputation.

On top of this, the authorities believed that the French population was not as growing quickly as it should be – and, in fact, that it was shrinking due to wars, plagues, and general misery. In response to Intendant Talon, who had asked him to find the means to form a "grand and powerful state" in Canada, which would involve a massive wave of immigrants, Colbert said, in a sentence that was to mark the future of the country, "It would not be prudent [of the king] to depopulate his kingdom as he would have to do to populate Canada." And yet, even had departures been multiplied tenfold, the effects of emigration on the most populous country in Europe would have been imperceptible – and the fate of North America would probably have been quite different. Reacting to the slow growth of the population, the King had women recruited between 1663-1673 to come to Canada. These women became known as «Les Filles du Roi» (the King's daughters) and they can be found in virtually every family tree of French Canadians today.

The result of this small founding population was that the French-Canadian stock grew from a relatively small number of people, about 10,000 immigrants. If we consider the male immigrants, from whom family names were transmitted through the generations, the number is reduced to about 4,500 – the total of immigrants who had at least one son who married.

Researching family history back to France is made more complicated by the "nom-dit" tradition. This was a family nickname (literally a "said name").  The origins of the noms-dits were various. Some noms-dits were the war-name of the first settler, while he was a soldier: Hébert dit Jolicoeur (Pretty Heart, cf. Braveheart), Thomas dit Tranchemontagne (mountain chopper). Some denoted the place of origin of the first settler: Langevin (Anjou), Barbeau dit Poitevin (Poitou). Others probably denoted a characteristic of the person or of his dwelling: Lacourse, Lépine, Larivière.

While Laplante is a famous "nom dit", there were colonists that arrived from France with this name:

1644 LOUIS BADAYAC LAPLANTE
1652 JACQUES SAUVE LAPLANTE PIERRE
1661 BONNIER LAPLANTE
1661 JEAN BAPTISTE LAPLANTE VEILLETTE
1662 CLEMENT LERIGER LAPLANTE
1665 MATHIEU RINGUET TESSIER LAPLANTE
1696 BONAVENTURE THOMAS LAPLANTE CHAMPAGNE
1731 JOSEPH LAPLANTE

Additional research is required to learn if our Laplante ancestors descended from these men.